Title Revealing a Phony Galaxy S22 Ultra Introducing the Deceptivene…
페이지 정보
작성자Tarah 댓글댓글 0건 조회조회 14회 작성일 24-08-20 01:07본문
Today, I will be diving right into the world of imitation smartphones by taking a look at a Galaxy S22 Ultra duplicate I acquired from AliExpress. Priced at just $123 for the 256GB model with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, of training course, not a real Samsung gadget.
Initial Impressions
The phone is advertised with outstanding specifications, consisting of 16-megapixel cams, a 6,800 mAh battery, and a 10-core MediaTek 6889 processor. It also guarantees a feature dubbed "Rubik's Cube innovation." Interested by these insurance claims, I purchased one to see for myself. After all, that would not desire a phone with Rubik's Cube innovation?
Upon arrival, the phone came in a simple black box identified S22 Ultra. Inside, I found the phone, a lightweight S Pen that does not fit inside the gadget, a clear situation, ipad 64 a spare screen guard, a light-weight and suspicious battery charger, a USB-C wire, headphones, a SIM adapter, and a manual. The incorporation of an earphone jack was a positive shock, yet the overstated claim of 32 million cams was clearly simply a translation error-- or was it?
Inspecting the Specifications
Turning the phone on, I headed directly to the "About Phone" section. Having actually run into fake specs in other Chinese phones, I was unconvinced.
Prior to diving deeper, I decided to check the fingerprint scanner. Establishing it up was straightforward, however when it came to unlocking the phone, any kind of finger-- or also a knuckle-- worked. It came to be clear that the phone did not have an actual fingerprint scanner; it simply bypassed the lock screen when you touched the designated area.
Analyzing Pre-installed Applications
I wondered concerning the pre-installed applications like Facebook, Netflix, and TikTok. Were they reputable? An odd message in the TikTok settings claiming the application would certainly not infringe on user passions elevated my suspicions. After validating with a pal using a genuine Galaxy S22 Ultra, I verified the message was real. Nevertheless, trying to upgrade TikTok via an APK data fell short, making me wary of its legitimacy.
The sketchiness didn't finish there. The web browser application, camouflaged as Google Chrome, asked for consents to take photos, document sound, and ipad 64 access calls. Declining these approvals crashed the application, more cementing my mistrust.
Revealing the Fact
Established to find the fact, I used Quick Faster way Maker to check out concealed applications. It didn't take lengthy to find an application by King Send Time called "Gadget Info." Opening it exposed the actual specs: a MediaTek MT-6580 cpu from 2016, Android 8.1, a 480p display screen, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of storage space-- much from the marketed specs.
Another application, "Switch Application" by KST, permitted me to modify the tool's presented specs. This app is used by fraudsters to phony the phone's specs, making it show up a lot more powerful than it is. With a few taps, I transformed the phone right into an "S40 Ultra" with ridiculous specifications, though these modifications were purely cosmetic.
Investigating Further
Digging much deeper, I uncovered that the phone's IMEI number matched that of an actual Galaxy S22 Ultra, showing they most likely cloned a genuine IMEI. This deceit included the hardware; opening up the phone disclosed that three of the 4 cameras were fake. The actual battery capacity was around 2,200 mAh, a mere 32% of the marketed 6,800 mAh.
Reassembly and Final thought
After documenting the actual specs and taking a great appearance inside, I reconstructed the phone. Regardless of its exterior appearance, this device is a testimony to deceptive advertising and marketing and questionable company techniques. It's a modern item of e-waste, packaged with lies.
In an attempt to resolve this, I contacted the vendor, supplying proof of the phone's illegal nature. They remained uncooperative. I will certainly proceed with obtaining a reimbursement due to the fact that no fraudster deserves my cash.
This has actually been a Massive Jeffries video clip. If you appreciated this, hit the subscribe switch and have a look at the scam-busting playlist for more videos similar to this. If you're in the market for made use of devices, visit my on-line shop connected in the summary. Thanks for viewing, and I'll catch you next time!
Priced at just $123 for the 256GB model with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, of program, not a genuine Samsung gadget. Upon arrival, the phone came in a simple black box labeled S22 Ultra. Inside, I located the phone, a flimsy S Pen that doesn't fit inside the tool, a clear instance, a spare display protector, a light-weight and suspicious charger, a USB-C cable television, headphones, a SIM adapter, and a guidebook. Transforming the phone on, I headed straight to the "About Phone" section. Digging deeper, I found that the phone's IMEI number matched that of a real Galaxy S22 Ultra, showing they most likely duplicated a legit IMEI.
Initial Impressions
The phone is advertised with outstanding specifications, consisting of 16-megapixel cams, a 6,800 mAh battery, and a 10-core MediaTek 6889 processor. It also guarantees a feature dubbed "Rubik's Cube innovation." Interested by these insurance claims, I purchased one to see for myself. After all, that would not desire a phone with Rubik's Cube innovation?
Upon arrival, the phone came in a simple black box identified S22 Ultra. Inside, I found the phone, a lightweight S Pen that does not fit inside the gadget, a clear situation, ipad 64 a spare screen guard, a light-weight and suspicious battery charger, a USB-C wire, headphones, a SIM adapter, and a manual. The incorporation of an earphone jack was a positive shock, yet the overstated claim of 32 million cams was clearly simply a translation error-- or was it?
Inspecting the Specifications
Turning the phone on, I headed directly to the "About Phone" section. Having actually run into fake specs in other Chinese phones, I was unconvinced.
Prior to diving deeper, I decided to check the fingerprint scanner. Establishing it up was straightforward, however when it came to unlocking the phone, any kind of finger-- or also a knuckle-- worked. It came to be clear that the phone did not have an actual fingerprint scanner; it simply bypassed the lock screen when you touched the designated area.
Analyzing Pre-installed Applications
The sketchiness didn't finish there. The web browser application, camouflaged as Google Chrome, asked for consents to take photos, document sound, and ipad 64 access calls. Declining these approvals crashed the application, more cementing my mistrust.
Revealing the Fact
Established to find the fact, I used Quick Faster way Maker to check out concealed applications. It didn't take lengthy to find an application by King Send Time called "Gadget Info." Opening it exposed the actual specs: a MediaTek MT-6580 cpu from 2016, Android 8.1, a 480p display screen, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of storage space-- much from the marketed specs.
Another application, "Switch Application" by KST, permitted me to modify the tool's presented specs. This app is used by fraudsters to phony the phone's specs, making it show up a lot more powerful than it is. With a few taps, I transformed the phone right into an "S40 Ultra" with ridiculous specifications, though these modifications were purely cosmetic.
Investigating Further
Digging much deeper, I uncovered that the phone's IMEI number matched that of an actual Galaxy S22 Ultra, showing they most likely cloned a genuine IMEI. This deceit included the hardware; opening up the phone disclosed that three of the 4 cameras were fake. The actual battery capacity was around 2,200 mAh, a mere 32% of the marketed 6,800 mAh.
Reassembly and Final thought
After documenting the actual specs and taking a great appearance inside, I reconstructed the phone. Regardless of its exterior appearance, this device is a testimony to deceptive advertising and marketing and questionable company techniques. It's a modern item of e-waste, packaged with lies.
In an attempt to resolve this, I contacted the vendor, supplying proof of the phone's illegal nature. They remained uncooperative. I will certainly proceed with obtaining a reimbursement due to the fact that no fraudster deserves my cash.
This has actually been a Massive Jeffries video clip. If you appreciated this, hit the subscribe switch and have a look at the scam-busting playlist for more videos similar to this. If you're in the market for made use of devices, visit my on-line shop connected in the summary. Thanks for viewing, and I'll catch you next time!
Priced at just $123 for the 256GB model with 8GB of RAM, this phone is, of program, not a genuine Samsung gadget. Upon arrival, the phone came in a simple black box labeled S22 Ultra. Inside, I located the phone, a flimsy S Pen that doesn't fit inside the tool, a clear instance, a spare display protector, a light-weight and suspicious charger, a USB-C cable television, headphones, a SIM adapter, and a guidebook. Transforming the phone on, I headed straight to the "About Phone" section. Digging deeper, I found that the phone's IMEI number matched that of a real Galaxy S22 Ultra, showing they most likely duplicated a legit IMEI.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.